10 fence contractors ranked by CR ScoreUpdated 0 paid placements in this rankingHow we rank →
Best overall in Onalaska: Phillips Outdoor Services, CR Score 86/100; 5.0★ from 121 Google reviews.
Most-reviewed: Invisible Fence Brand of the Tri States, Rochester and Southern MN, 126 Google reviews at 4.9★, the most of 10 ranked; ranked #2.
Rankings can't be bought. Contractors can't pay to change their rank or score. How we rank
10 Onalaska fence contractors are ranked here by CR Score, from 8 published factors. 2 open Saturdays and 2 open Sundays, based on posted hours. The median Google rating is 5.0★ across 10 rated businesses.
| Rank | Business | CR Score | Google rating | Based in | Hours | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phillips Outdoor Services | 86 | 5.0★ (121) | Onalaska | — | Overall |
| 2 | Invisible Fence Brand of the Tri States, Rochester and Southern MN | 83 | 4.9★ (126) | Holmen, 6 mi away | — | Most reviews |
| 3 | Lovejoy Fencing | 82 | 4.3★ (11) | La Crosse, 7 mi away | Sat · Sun · Evenings | — |
| 4 | Sunshine Services | 82 | 5.0★ (54) | West Salem, 10 mi away | Sat · Sun · Evenings | — |
| 5 | Flyway Fence Company, LLC | 78 | 5.0★ (47) | Holmen, 22 mi away | — | — |
| 6 | Creekside Fence LLC | 78 | 4.4★ (44) | Holmen, 10 mi away | — | — |
| 7 | Fence Brothers | 77 | 5.0★ (41) | Winona, 22 mi away | — | — |
| 8 | Red Stone Fence Company | 74 | 5.0★ (16) | Sparta, 23 mi away | — | — |
| 9 | Century Fence | 72 | 2.3★ (3) | West Salem, 11 mi away | — | — |
| 10 | Moe Fencing Inc | 70 | 5.0★ (3) | Holmen, 17 mi away | — | — |
Ordered by CR Score, a 0–100 score from 8 published factors. Paid placement never changes the order.
Scores below: based on 6 of 8 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected. Hatched segments mark factors we don't have yet.
Ranked #1 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 5.0★ from 121 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Fence contractor”.
Based in Holmen, 6 mi away
Ranked #2 because of its Google rating and review volume: 4.9★ from 126 Google reviews, the most Google reviews on this list (126).
Based in La Crosse, 7 mi away
Ranked #3 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.3★ from 11 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Fence contractor”.
Based in West Salem, 10 mi away
Ranked #4 because of its Google rating and review volume: 5.0★ from 54 Google reviews, 54 Google reviews.
Based in Holmen, 22 mi away
Ranked #5 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 5.0★ from 47 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Fence contractor”.
Based in Holmen, 10 mi away
Ranked #6 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.4★ from 44 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Fence contractor”.
Based in Winona, 22 mi away
Ranked #7 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 5.0★ from 41 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Fence contractor”.
Based in Sparta, 23 mi away
Ranked #8 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 5.0★ from 16 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Fence contractor”.
Based in West Salem, 11 mi away
Ranked #9 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 2.3★ from 3 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Fence contractor”.
Based in Holmen, 17 mi away
Ranked #10 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 5.0★ from 3 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Fence contractor”.
National price ranges in USD, not adjusted for Onalaska. Each row names its basis and the month we checked it.
| Job | Low | Typical | High | Basis | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fence installation | $1,860 | $3,276 | $4,844 | Per project: typical range of customer-reported installs (about $23 per linear foot on average). US national range | October 2026 |
We scored 10 Onalaska fence contractors on 8 factors, weighted as shown. A business is ranked when its trade is confirmed and it has 3 or more Google reviews or a claimed profile. Unknown factors are left out of the score, not counted as zero. Scores last refreshed October 22, 2026.
Paid placement never changes a rank or score. Featured businesses are paid, labelled, limited to 3 and shown above the ranking, outside it.
| Factor | Weight | Computed from | In Onalaska data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reputation | 35% | Bayesian-adjusted Google star rating | Measured |
| Credentials | 15% | Active state license 0.6, bond 0.2, workers’ comp 0.2 | Not yet collected |
| Review volume | 10% | log10(reviews + 1) against the list maximum | Measured |
| Recency | 10% | Share of reviews from the last 12 months | Not yet collected |
| Availability | 10% | Weekly open hours, Saturday, Sunday, 24/7 or same-day | Measured |
| Trade focus | 10% | Google main category 1.0, business name 0.7, additional category 0.5 | Measured |
| Proximity | 5% | 1.0 when based in the city, falling to 0 at the trade’s radius | Measured |
| Completeness | 5% | Website, photos, description, hours, claimed profile (0.2 each) | Measured |