61 water damage restoration companies ranked by CR ScoreUpdated 0 paid placements in this rankingHow we rank →
Best overall in Moosic: SERVPRO of Kingston, Pittston City and Wyoming County, CR Score 62/100; 4.9★ from 129 Google reviews; open 24/7.
Best for emergencies (open 24/7): SERVPRO of Carbondale/Clarks Summit/Old Forge, posts 24/7 hours; ranked #2 of 61.
Most-reviewed: Stanley Steemer, 1,850 Google reviews at 4.9★, the most of 61 ranked; ranked #15.
Rankings can't be bought. Contractors can't pay to change their rank or score. How we rank
61 Moosic water damage restoration companies are ranked here by CR Score, from ten published factors. 34 are open 24/7, 44 open Saturdays and 40 open Sundays, based on posted hours. The median Google rating is 4.8★ across 61 rated businesses.
| Rank | Business | CR Score | Google rating | Based in | Hours | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SERVPRO of Kingston, Pittston City and Wyoming County | 62 | 4.9★ (129) | Kingston, 10 mi away | 24/7 | Overall |
| 2 | SERVPRO of Carbondale/Clarks Summit/Old Forge | 61 | 4.5★ (54) | Moosic | 24/7 | Emergencies |
| 3 | Disaster Blaster of Scranton & Wilkes-Barre | 60 | 4.6★ (56) | Scranton, 6 mi away | 24/7 | — |
| 4 | SERVPRO of Wayne and South Lackawanna Counties | 60 | 5.0★ (16) | Moosic | 24/7 | — |
| 5 | Integra-Clean & Dry | 60 | 4.9★ (83) | Scranton, 19 mi away | 24/7 | — |
| 6 | SERVPRO of Hanover & Pittston Township, Bear Creek, Mountain Top | 60 | 4.8★ (60) | Hanover, 13 mi away | 24/7 | — |
| 7 | Roto-Rooter Plumbing & Water Cleanup | 60 | 4.8★ (1,592) | Scranton, 9 mi away | 24/7 | — |
| 8 | Restoration 1 of Mt. Pocono | 59 | 4.9★ (30) | Olyphant, 12 mi away | 24/7 | — |
| 9 | ServiceMaster by Griffing - Dalton | 59 | 4.6★ (89) | Archbald, 16 mi away | 24/7 | — |
| 10 | Best Care Detailing | 59 | 5.0★ (15) | Kingston, 5 mi away | 24/7 | — |
Ordered by CR Score, a 0–100 score from ten published factors. Paid placement never changes the order.
Ranked #1 in Moosic
Based in Kingston, 10 mi away
Ranked #1 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.9★ from 129 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Moosic
Ranked #2 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.5★ from 54 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Scranton, 6 mi away
Ranked #3 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.6★ from 56 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Moosic
Ranked #4 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 5.0★ from 16 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Scranton, 19 mi away
Ranked #5 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.9★ from 83 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Hanover, 13 mi away
Ranked #6 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.8★ from 60 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Scranton, 9 mi away
Ranked #7 because of its Google rating and review volume: 4.8★ from 1,592 Google reviews.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Olyphant, 12 mi away
Ranked #8 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.9★ from 30 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Archbald, 16 mi away
Ranked #9 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.6★ from 89 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Kingston, 5 mi away
Ranked #10 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 5.0★ from 15 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Scranton, 7 mi away
Ranked #11 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.8★ from 19 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Archbald, 11 mi away
Ranked #12 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.6★ from 37 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Allentown, 22 mi away
Ranked #13 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 5.0★ from 41 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Hazleton, 30 mi away
Ranked #14 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.9★ from 79 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Exeter, 7 mi away
Ranked #15 because of its Google rating and review volume: 4.9★ from 1,850 Google reviews, the most in Moosic.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Moosic
Ranked #16 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 3.5★ from 6 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Archbald, 13 mi away
Ranked #17 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.1★ from 53 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Fire damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Exeter, 12 mi away
Ranked #18 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.6★ from 11 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Lehighton, 36 mi away
Ranked #19 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.8★ from 86 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Lakewood, 38 mi away
Ranked #20 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.9★ from 357 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Edgewater, 38 mi away
Ranked #21 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 5.0★ from 38 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Arlington Heights, 29 mi away
Ranked #22 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 5.0★ from 13 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Bloomsburg, 38 mi away
Ranked #23 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.8★ from 33 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
Based in Archbald, 13 mi away
Ranked #24 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.8★ from 17 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Water damage restoration service”.
Based on 7 of 10 factors; credentials, recency and availability not yet collected.
Based in Exeter, 8 mi away
Ranked #25 because of its Google rating and trade focus: 4.7★ from 13 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Fire damage restoration service”.
Based on 8 of 10 factors; credentials and recency not yet collected.
#1 to #25 are shown in full above. Here are #26 to #50, in CR Score order; each links to its profile. We publish the top 50 of 61 ranked water damage restoration companies here; the rest are on their profiles.
20 more water damage restoration companies within 40 mi that we can't rank yet: too few reviews, or a trade we couldn't confirm. Listed A to Z.
| Business | Google rating | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| Adisalvi Company | 34 mi | |
| B & C Construction LLC | 5.0★ (1) | 38 mi |
| Creative Concrete Restoration | 10 mi | |
| DDB Building Restorations LLC | 3.4★ (5) | 15 mi |
| Family Restoration Home Improvement Inc. | 4.8★ (66) | 38 mi |
| FTF Painting and Restoration | 5 mi | |
| HomePro Public Adjuster of Hazleton, Wilkes Barre,Berwick,Pottsville | 30 mi | |
| M & G Restoration | 4.5★ (2) | 38 mi |
| Matt Restoration | 5.0★ (3) | 37 mi |
| Montec Restoration Services | 32 mi | |
| New Jersey Total Renovation Services LLC | 1.0★ (1) | 38 mi |
| Premier Paver Restoration | 35 mi | |
| Rapid Pro Restoration LLC | 17 mi | |
| Scranton Roofing | 2 mi | |
| ServiceMaster Restoration by Complete | 5.0★ (2) | 38 mi |
| SERVPRO of Western Essex County | 5.0★ (1) | 38 mi |
| Stain Away Steam Cleaning | 26 mi | |
| UrbanMoss Crew | 5 mi | |
| Water fire & smoke restoration | 21 mi | |
| William HokeJr., CPI Public Adjuster Service | 3.0★ (1) | 30 mi |
National price ranges in USD, not adjusted for Moosic. Each row names its basis and the month we checked it.
| Job | Low | Typical | High | Basis | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water damage restoration | $1,383 | $3,868 | $6,369 | Per job: typical range of customer-reported restorations. US national range | October 2026 |
We scored 61 Moosic water damage restoration companies on ten factors, weighted as shown. A business is ranked when its trade is confirmed and it has 3 or more Google reviews or a claimed profile. A business with no Google reviews scores zero on rating, review volume and recency. Other unknown factors are left out, not counted as zero. Scores last refreshed October 22, 2026.
Paid placement never changes a rank or score. Featured businesses are paid, labelled, limited to 3 and shown above the ranking, outside it.
| Factor | Weight | Computed from | In Moosic data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reputation | 25% | Google star rating, adjusted for how many reviews back it | Measured |
| Credentials | 15% | Active state license, bond and workers’ comp on file | Not yet collected |
| Review volume | 10% | Number of Google reviews, compared with the most-reviewed business on the list | Measured |
| Recency | 5% | Share of reviews from the last 12 months | Not yet collected |
| Availability | 5% | Weekly open hours, Saturday, Sunday, 24/7 or same-day | Measured |
| Trade focus | 10% | How clearly the business does this trade (its Google category and name) | Measured |
| Proximity | 5% | Based in the city scores highest, less the farther away it is | Measured |
| Claimed profile | 10% | The business has claimed its ContractorsRanked profile (free or paid earn the same) | Measured |
| Partnered | 5% | The business links to ContractorsRanked from its own website with our badge, checked periodically | Measured |
| ContractorsRanked reviews | 10% | Verified customer reviews collected by ContractorsRanked: their rating and how many there are | Measured |